
It's been a couple years since we
attended a Dam-to-Dam barefoot race in Austin. For whatever reason,
the race seems to have lost it's legendary luster. In 2009,
only 5 teams showed up. So when we received the email about
the race this year, I wasn't sure about attending it, but I knew
Freestyle skier Landen Ehlers was planning to ski with his dad Blake
Ehlers, who is the organizer of the event. I wanted to support
them since Landen has been participating in the Freestyle Challenge.
I wanted to show them we were here to support them the way they
supported us this year.
The Austin Barefoot Ski Club is
still one of the biggest barefoot clubs in the US. Over the
last few years, there's been disagreements between key members in
the club that has hurt it's overall membership numbers. Blake Ehlers
has been one of the main organizers of the D2D for many years. He works with club members Jim Rollins and Phil
Gustafson to make this event happen. We
talked the guys a bit at the Friday night party about the decline in
number of competitors over the last couple years. We talked about the core club
members who made the race what it is and how they've had
disagreements over the years. We talked about how the key members
are getting older and now have family responsibilities. We talked about many of the young skiers
not being as interested in the race as their dads were. We
discussed the economy and cost of travel, we talked about the Pro
division running Ski Pros vs inboards, we talked about the lack of
promotion for racing as a whole on BarefootCentral.com since BFC dropped the Racing Cup
Series, and we talked about how after 25 years, many club members
have lost the drive to push it to be bigger each year. No one
reason for the decline was correct, but we did agree that it was a combination of
many of these issues.
The good news was the race still
draws the most competitive skiers and teams. Two teams from the former BFC Racing Cup Series are still competing against each other (Mach 5
from St. Louis and Top Gun from Austin). The St. Louis
crew is still one of the most dedicated and fun group of barefooters you'll ever meet. Team Top Gun is still on a mission to
prove they're the most dominate racing team to ever take to the
water; unfortunately, they just don't have a lot of
competition to really drive that point home and we're not hearing of
any teams on the horizon that plan to step up their game. They
have proven that a team of 5 guys that train together and race
together throughout the year will become so dominant that a team
that only skis together once a year will never have a chance against
them. I compare it to a person who runs a couple miles a week
trying to compete against a runner that's training to compete in the
Iron Man Triathlon.

So what's in it for the top Pro
teams at the Dam-2-Dam? It's all about the course record for
them. They want to see how fast they can complete the 19 mile
course. This year, Top Gun blew away the previous record of a
24m:24s with a new course record of 22:17. If you do the math
on that, you'll find out that the team averaged over 55mph and that
time includes 4 transitions. Several of the skiers ran their
passes at nearly 60mp to make the average 55. Water conditions
have to be perfect for that to happen, and this year, they were
perfect. The two other teams that competed with Top Gun in the Pro
division finished 4-5 minutes behind them. The two other Pro
teams consisting of Mach 5 from St. Louis and a team named SkiPro
East which was made up of a random group of racers from across the
country including John Skobrak-CT, Ryan Moore-TX, Warren Wilke-TX,
Mark Donahue-IN. These two teams were neck and neck at the
finish with Mach-5 taking the 2nd spot by seconds.

Team
Skipro East - 3rd Place |

Team
Mach 5 - 2nd Place |

Team
Top Gun - 1st Place |

22 min
17 sec - New Course Record |
What's in it for the
competitors that don't train like the pros? For the teams that don't compete
at the Pro Level, the D2D offers an Inboard/Outboard division.
This division is called the Open Division. This year saw 4
teams in the Open Division. A team of Arizona Footers lead by
one time Racing Cup Series skier John Hill, drove in from Pheonix to
see how they would fair against the Austin based defending Open Division
Champions
consisting of Blake and Landen Ehlers, Jim Rollins and a good friend
of Landen's. They would also be up against another strong
inboard team led by Royal Wiseman and Jimmy Taurus (we'll call them
the Barefoot Ranch Footers). A forth team was running behind a
Flightcraft, but all the skiers were 1st timers and ended up not
being able to finish the race.
 |

Team
Barefot Ski Ranch - 3rd Place |

Team
Arizona Footers - 2nd Place |

Team
Father & Son - 1st Place |
 |
The team dubbed "Father & Son"
dominated the Open division with a finishing time of 27m?sec, at
least 3 minutes ahead of the Arizona Footers and over 5 minutes
ahead of the Barefoot Ranch footers.

The Eagle
Sports & BarefootCentral.com rig |

Steiner
Ranch Pavilion - where they all meet |

Michele
Gleason of BFC took care of all the guys questions. |

John Hill
of the Arizona Footers couldn't get enough skiing |
The overall format of the D2D has
not changed much in the last 25 years. They have a Friday
night party where teams register, they race on Saturday (which in
the past was for preliminary rounds) and then on Sunday for the
finals if enough teams participate. They host a barbeque lunch
after the Saturday Prelims. They have trophies and t-shirts
for all teams. With the drop in participation, the event is
now a one day event, but the barbeque is still great, and skiers
have a great time visiting and even doing some skiing after lunch.

For the skiers that participated
this year, the whether was chilly, but water was perfect.
There's only been a couple times in the races history that the water
was as smooth as it was throughout the entire course. There
was a fog on the water in the morning, but as it lifted, it revealed
glass calm water.
This
year, I did not race in the event. Instead, I sat in the boat
at the finish line along with Phil Gustafson and two event safety
officials that were attending the event for the first time. I had a good time reminiscing of past D2Ds with Phil Gustafson as we
described the D2D to the safety judges. We talked about the record years where they had
18-19 teams, the year Wateski Magazine had us do the start twice
because they missed the shot. The year that had 30 mph winds,
rain & sleet resulting in over 20 transitions just to get to the 360
bridge. We talked about how the skiers have taken the event
from a crazy drunken fun race to a highly trained athletic team
marathon. We talked about the creative things Paul Stokes
would do to bend the rules to gain an advantage thus helping define
the rules for later races. We talked about how now that if
your starter can't go way past the 360 bridge at 50+mph, you won't
win the Pro division. We talked about the types of boats used
(SkiPros vs Inboards), how transitions have evolved, and
speeds going from 40s to well over the 50s. We talked about
how cool it was in the hay-day as we evolved the sport and competed
against each other. Phil and I would always be skiing against
each other and our desire to beat each other's teams pushed us to
train that much harder.
Ultimately,
the conversations lead to "How do we get people back into
racing the D2D?" I was asked this question by many
footers throughout the weekend. My answer to that question
isn't cut and dry. But one thing I do know is if the pre
and post promotion isn't there, the interest won't be there
either. Organizers have to be very diligent about
promoting the event using the media available to them (Facebook,
Email, Forums, BFC, printed Mags etc...). But it goes well
beyond just putting out blasts about an upcoming event. If
you want to build, you have to do as much, if not more, POST
media than you do pre-media. You need stories about the
race, the racers, the organizers. You need plenty of pictures
and videos that show people what it's like to attend the event.
What is there to do in the city hosting the event outside the
race? Why should someone want to drive across country to
attend the event? And as much as everyone
likes Facebook, just posting random pictures and random comments
about the event on Facebook is just a short-lived shattered
attempt at a post review. People like being able to read
an official article that they can pass around and easily get
back to. They need a place to go that contains information
about all the events, upcoming events, and read stories about
past events. If you think I'm describing a site LIKE
BarefootCentral.com just for racing, you're on the right track.
What we've
discovered since BFC got out of the Racing Cup Series is that
the current racing teams have not been able to put together a
website dedicated to their sport. They haven't been able
to agree on formats, venues, etc.. They know how to use Facebook,
or post random videos, in a very sporadic fashion, but they
don't know how to report on an event from a 10,000 foot
perspective, look beyond their own team, or report on an event
as if you're a reporter for Waterski Mag given the assignment to
report on several teams, backgrounds, rivalries, etc... Racing
has no identity as a hole, no personality, no good-guy vs
bad-guy stories. They're all having fun racing but it's
just become boring to follow. This is my opinion of
course. I'll no doubt get a bunch of hate mail from a few
racers over this.
If your race
doesn't have the budget or resources to run a full-blown
website, the alternative to creating your own site is assigning
a person in your organization to be responsible for writing
articles and submitting them to BFC knowing that you'll need a
comprehensive and well written article on the event to get
published, whether that be on BFC or in Waterski Magazine.
Each event should have a person assigned to this task.
Each year, write an article from a different perspective.
The possibilities are limitless. Just emailing a couple pictures and list of times and results
won't cut it. Fans want to know what it was like being at
the race. We want to know about the rivalries, where the
teams come from, the problems and how they were overcome.
We want the lows as well as the highs. We want something
you'll want to talk about at the office the next day.
Something that'll make us want to come to your event next year.
Partnering with a site like BFC that has the target audience
you're looking for is a must. Partnering to provide them
content results in them wanting to be involved in your event
each year, so when you ask for donations, or coverage, the decisions come
much faster. Posting short blurbs on Facebook only speaks
to a handfull of people that have joined your group. Have you approached Facebook for donations or
sponsorship lately? Or are you blindly posting content
with no regard to what it's costing you. At my last
calculation, Facebook has not sponsored a single waterski event
worldwide. All organizers, and skiers need to keep that in
mind and Facebook should
be used as a tool, not as your sole point of operation and
communication with the world.
As for the
Dam-to-Dam, a question was posed to me about what is needed to
build this event back to it's glory days? Albeit, these
are only ideas, but maybe they'll spur on something with the
club. The D2D is the Grannd-Daddy of all races, but it's
had a problem determining it's path and has made changes that I
feel have affected its attendance. The Club first needs to
determine if they really want it to be the premiere race others
model themselves after, or if
they're happy using it to raise a few extra bucks each year.
If they want to build it back, they need to start promoting for
next year NOW! Start having some meetings inside the club
to determine if they want to keep the same format (Pro vs Open),
or if they need to do something different. Assign a
Marketing person. Make it a young person that is naive to
some of the issues from the past and isn't associated with any
one team. My opinion is you need something different.
The Pro footers haven't proven they can build and maintain a
league, so I'd set my focus back to the Open or Inboard Only
division. SkiPro is out of business, and though the boats
are perfect for high-end racing, they aren't good for organizers
looking to attract more competitors. Boat companies may
want to
get involved again if they are the main event. Running all
inboards will not limit the horse-power, but it will give
competitors a more level field to play on and rough water skiers
will become that much more important to a team instead of just
speed demons. The top
teams will still fair well but it'll change their game plans up.
It ultimately does still come down to skiing ability.
I'd like to
see a D2D event be one of total randomness. If a skier
brings a boat, they become a team captain. All the other
skiers names are thrown into a hat. You can have top
skiers in one hat, and all others in a 2nd hat. Ask skiers
to rank themselves at registration. The captains draw from
hat #1 first, then hat #2. You'd then draw from a third
hat for heats and lanes. We did this once at a Cup Series
fun race and had so much fun. We still talk about that
race. If the Pros revolt about the decision, invite them to have
a Pro Div race in Austin earlier in the year, or run that race
on Friday. The BFC Cup
Series used to bring 6 teams to the game, money, trophies, etc
which warranted a special race, but it's now down to 2 to 3 pro
teams at best. Unless they can do the same, you shouldn't
be running your event differently anymore. The issue the
D2D has is one of identity. The race has lost it's
identity. We all grew up with the D2D being the learning
grounds with teams like Team Viagra, the Sole Sisters, the
Breakfast Boys, etc... It needs to get back to a crazier
state of randomness where anyone could win. The Austin
Barefoot Club is still the biggest club in the US. D2D
organizers should be using the club's size to get at least one
Pro skier to commit to the race a year in advance. Book a
pro like Ron Scarpa or Paul Macdonald for a summer Junior Dev
clinic in return for their commitment to ski in the next D2D.
Fill their pockets with clinics and they'll support you in
return. If you find out that Andre de Villiers will be in
the Unites States during the reace, GET HIM THERE and make him a
team captain. Who wouldn't want to race with him? Work on sponsors now to raise funds to fly in key people.
Put them up and waive entry fees in return for their commitment
to be there in advance so you can promote that for at least 3
mos. If the first 6 mos, focus on the sponsors and key
people you want there. Get that done first. Then
spend the next 3-4 mos promoting. Spend sponsor money on
an ad in Waterski, Waterskier, or on BFC. Identify a host
hotel and work with local town officials to find out about how
you can get advertising money back if people stay in local
hotels. Have an early entry discount. The goal would
be to have 80% of the teams signed up before Oct 1. And
don't forget to sit down and ask yourselves how the club can get
industry businesses like Eagle Sports, Barefoot International,
Sanger and BFC involved so they
want to attend your event and look at it as a good way to build
their businesses.
At the end of
the day, there is so much you can do with the D2D, but it also
requires some agreement between the members running the club and
some good old hard work. Egos and emotions need to be
checked at the door. Guys too close to a single racing
team should not be involved in the decisions because it'll just
get emotional. Base you decisions on facts and your
knowledge of how the waterski maket works. But my advice is
take some chances, make it an inboard/outboard only event, and
mix the skiers up. Think outside the box a bit.
Final thought, have the Friday night party at a go-cart racing
facility. Get the racing juices flowing early.
Chuck Gleason
Team BFC, Team Eagle Sports
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Email we received
from D2D Race Organizer (Blake Ehler) after reading this article
Chuck, first of all thanks for coming to
the race and promoting us on your web site. It was good to see you and
your family again this last weekend. Your article is good and thought
provoking and the pictures are great.
I have to honestly say my first thought when I read your opening
paragraph about the race was "oh crap" but the more I read it (at least
three times) the more I understand your angle as a reporter with a good
story. Its an interesting topic, the rise and fall of the Dam to Dam.
But is it broken? Does it need to be fixed? I think you summed up your
argument best when you said "The Club first needs to determine if they
really want it to be the premiere race others model themselves after, or
if they're happy using it to raise a few extra bucks each year"
What's ironic about that statement is we actually have been doing both
and really don't care much about either.
Every barefoot endurance race in the world has been modeled after us. In
fact we wrote the book....and we certainly don't do this for the money.
To be honest, we dont need the money. That's why we have always had the
best food, beer, t-shirts and awards for every skier. We are happy to
break even if that's all we do and lately with the low turn out, that's
all we have done....and that's ok.
The popularity of the Dam to Dam in my opinion is living out a natural
cycle. I remember when you used to compete in 3-event barefoot
tournaments and endurance races. Why did you stop? Same reason everybody
eventually stops; life, family, career, old age, been there done
that....
When The Dam to Dam was first attempted there were only two boats and
what seemed like an entire ocean between both dams. The first teams did
not even finish. The race was an unique Austin Barefoot Club event for
club members only. Over the years, locals would try to learn to barefoot
just to compete in the race. Other footers came throughout the South
Central Region to Austin each November to give it a try. The race is the
single reason Austin grew one of the biggest barefoot clubs in the
country.
My first race was in 1993. We had three boats and picked teams on the
starting dock. After the race the losers would cook breakfast for the
winners at Jimmys house. In 1996 my team finally won the race and I sent
a picture of us celebrating with sea-weed on our heads to Water-Ski
Magazine. They published the picture and the next year we had a few more
boats. In 1996 I called Water-Ski Magazine over and over until I
convinced the editor to send a photographer and writer who actually
skied in the race. We put him in the boat with Royal, who was 9 at the
time, to ski thru 30 mph winds and sleet. A few months later they
published a huge spread of the race and the following year we had a
record turn out....we were no longer the funky little Dam to Dam.
We peaked in 2004 with 18 teams and over 100 skiers from all over the
country including Ron Scarpa, Keith StOnge, Paul Stokes, Jason Lee, Paul
McDonald, Lane Bowers and Peter Fleck. We had girl teams, kid teams and
old men teams. I can remember when Top Gun was made up of a few beginner
barefooters and was always dragging in last place. Over the years we
have written and rewritten the rules many times. I can name a person,
team or event for every rule we have adopted over the years
including...the use of booties, butt riding, breaker boats, 10' rope
lengths, use of pro skiers and staying in your lanes at the start.
I can't tell you how many times I have answered questions from other
clubs and sent our rules and info to them so they can put on their own
race. The Dam to Dam has spawned at least another dozen similar races
across the country plus Canada, Australia and New Zealand. I have been
fortunate enough to have skied in many of them. Barefoot endurance
racing even became its own water sport with its own season with the BFC
Racing Cup Series.
This year we celebrated our 23rd race with 35 skiers, not that big, but
not that bad either. I have no doubt that with your suggestions it could
once again be one of the biggest barefoot events in the country. I can
tell you this...I don't have the energy or time it would take to promote
it that way, but some day somebody will. I agree it would have to be
someone new and young and excited about the sport to take it back up a
notch....but for right now don't worry about us down here in Austin,
we're doing just fine. Our race isn't broken, its just living out its
natural cycle. Some day it might be a mega race again, but if we get
down to just two boats and pick up teams that can't finish...that will
be o.k. too.
Blake Ehlers
President Austin Barefoot Ski Club
p.s. here is a list of the teams and the times:
Open
4th place, Dam Fools- DNF
3rd place, Ski Ranch Team 40:26
2nd place, Arizona Team 31:51
1st place, Father Son Team 27:38
Pro
3rd place, Chris McWaters Team 27:29
2nd place, Mach V 27:19
1st place, Top Gun 22:12
Here is a video from our boat that Landen made, enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttVwoP_qbJc
|